New Delhi, Jan 27 (UNI) The Supreme Court today suggested the adoption of stricter and more deterrent measures to address acid attack cases, observing that offenders’ properties could be attached and auctioned if they are unable to compensate victims.
A Bench, comprising Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi, was hearing a public interest litigation seeking comprehensive directions on the handling of acid attack cases.
Emphasising the gravity of such offences, the Bench underscored that punishments must be severe enough to act as an effective deterrent.
The Court observed that compensation to victims is non-negotiable and must be ensured even if it requires the sale of the offender’s assets. “If the accused cannot pay compensation, why not attach all assets and then auction them to pay off the victim?” the CJI remarked during the hearing.
Stating that acid attacks demand a response beyond routine legal consequences, the Bench noted that conventional reformative theories may not be adequate in such cases.
“Some extraordinary punitive measures are needed beyond the letter of the law. Unless the action is so painful for the accused, it will not work,” the CJI observed.
The Court directed all States and union Territories to place on record comprehensive data on acid attack cases across the country. It asked the governments to submit year-wise details of reported incidents, the status of charge-sheets, the number of cases decided, and those pending.
Further, the Bench sought victim-specific information, including academic qualifications, employment status, marital status, medical treatment undergone, expenses incurred or likely to be incurred, and details of rehabilitation schemes, if any, extended to acid attack survivors.
The Court granted four weeks’ time for compliance.
During the proceedings, the Bench reiterated that acid attacks are offences of extreme seriousness, comparable to other grave crimes against women, and warrant stringent legal responses.
The CJI also asked the union government to examine whether legislative intervention or legal reforms were necessary to address acid attacks more effectively.
Addressing Additional Solicitor General Archana Pathak Dave, the CJI observed, “Think of some legislative intervention… this is not less serious than dowry death also.”
The Court’s directions were issued amid growing concerns over delays in the trial of acid attack cases.
The Supreme Court had earlier directed the Registrars General of all High Courts to furnish details of pending acid attack trials nationwide, highlighting systemic delays and the urgent need to ensure timely justice for survivors.
