SS
Chitwadgi: Mega prizes on TV channels absolutely are bad.
Only those who read and commit to memory from "general knowledge
books" get the ready answer. Once the mega prize is announced
in favour of some one probably the very winning person may
forget the answer in due course, so also the listeners. How
memorizing helps in life in practice except in competitive
interviews. One should know where to refer for any answer.
One cannot commit to memory say "Dictionary" but one knows
to find out. So the TV channel exercise in awarding mega prizes
are both bad financially and morally. Financial sudden rise
of a person awardee takes him for more often in advances to
wrong practices in life than good causes. Similarly, there
is an unexpected social imbalance to find one winner changes
in lifestyle which may cause a certain kind of misconceptions
within a social order. In fact mega prize is comparatively
easily got which may often lead to wrong deeds of a person.
When we are in activities like NREGA providing work for the
poor why not put large sums in rural development instead of
individual awards? Employment guarantee is a problem in our
poor country. Few rich can hardly make good in pooling resources
for removing poverty of the nation. Individuals may realize
large sums but it may not prove any permanent measure for
uplifting society.
RK
Gupta: Greed is one of the seven sins. It ultimately
leads to the gateway of hell. TV channels earn incalculable
money from the viewers and from the advertising agencies.
Nowadays, so many programmes have been launched like `Kaun
Banega Carorepati', reality shows, laughter shows, and other
with prizes up to even Rs 10 crores. Indian viewers are
almost addicted and sit before their TV sets for hours and
hours. The TV watchers are tempted to participate in the
mega programmes. All the greedy persons do take part, very
few, out of millions succeed in a very keen and hard competition
at the cost of their health and wealth, only one candidate
succeeds and he is no doubt awarded an attractive prize
and many empty promises not to be kept in the future. In
the whole process the real losers are the TV viewers who
get their pockets emptied, overall it is a sheer wastage
of the valuable money and time. 80% population of India,
mostly of the middle class, who are over ambitious to become
billionaires and this desire has been kindled by the market
economy and the liberalization all over the globe. One should
keep in mind that an easy money goes away very easily. Riches
have wings. Only money earned by virtue of hard work is
lasting and money ill-gotten is ill-spent. So, `avarice
is the root of all evils'. Mega prizes on TV channels are
neither good for the society nor for the individuals as
well.
Jaskaran Singh
Dhami: A prize, be it 'mega' or 'meager' is always
of immense value if it comes as a recognition of our talent,
a fruit of our hard work, as an accolade for our devotion
or as an honour for the sustained and focused effort. A
prize won in a lottery on the other hand is of an altogether
different case. It has only materialistic value. In this
case it is 'chance' which we term as 'luck' that matters.
It does not come to us because we have done something worthwhile
to deserve it. Mega prizes on offer on TV channels are amalgam
of both these ingredients. You need to showcase a special
talent to be there but the luck or chance factor also plays
an important part. I personally feel that the reality shows
etc on TV channels are serving as platforms or springboards
for many talented and aspiring singers, dancers, actors
and other artists. The prizes or the mega prizes they win
are rewards in recognition of their talent and also a fruit
of their hard work with a tinge of chance or good luck,
so their being good for them is beyond questionability.
If a talented person gets a chance to make fast and big
bucks it puts him on the sound financial footing and he/she
can pursue his/her goal more vigorously. Some winners of
mega prizes can't digest the celebrity status and money
earned overnight through TV shows. Their ego gets so inflated
that they deviate from their track and these mega winners
on TV competitions end up mega losers in the real life competition.
Worldly wisdom teaches that it is better for the reputation
to fail conventionally than to succeed unconventionally.
The overdose of madness or euphoria associated with TV shows
sometimes takes its toll on the contestants and specially
on the winners. I have a feeling that some recent incidents
involving losers and winners of TV bear testimony to the
ill effects of winning the mega prizes and celebrity status
and loosing these narrowly. The bottom line is tha, the
talent needs to be hunted, nurtured and recognized and TV
shows are doing a commendable job in this direction but
at the same time the hype should not be allowed to engulf
the artists' emotional / psychological well being. William
Shakespeare says, "There is some ill a-brewing towards my
rest, For I did dream of money-bags to-night." I leave the
rest to the readers' imagination.
Rajeev N:
Are the crowding line up of participants in the TV reality
shows is just because of the big size of the prize offered?
If only a token prize is given at the end of the show how
many of them will turn up? How much is 'big' or 'very big'
or for that matter 'mega'? To all these questions, you may
get an answer starting with, 'it depends...' Yes! It really
depends on the mindset and individual differences of the
participants on one side and the couch potatoes who never
hesitate to send a number of SMSes just to see that his/her
choice charm would figure in the final stage. To me, the
yearning for recognition and fame, to test one in the real
situations are the real reasons which draw one to these
competitions. The rest, all the prizes are just bonus. If
the stage is well set and the the participants establish
themselves really well, the springboard they get itself
is the real mega prize. This can make one really big in
life. The size of the amount or the bungalows or cars or
anything of that sort is temporary in the material world.
The real winner of the real life (not the reality show)
will be the one who is not carried away with the inflated
prizes ((Must have some inflationary effect?) given these
days.
Satish Kumar
Singh: Today mega prizes are synonyms of reality shows
and no channel would like to lag behind in this race, because
it is an excellent way of improving TRP rating of every
channel. Without mega prizes or reality shows, not a single
TV channel can survive in the market. To remain in the market;
TV channels are compelled to take help of reality shows.
Similarly, individual's interest also lies in these shows,
because through such kinds of shows individual can earn
name, fame and money. As a common man; we need not more
than this. Thus, mega prizes or reality shows are just reflection
of individual's desire. So in my opinion, mega prizes or
reality shows are really good for individuals. Some points
are given hereunder. Just look at them-: 1-No doubt; level
of competition in mega prizes or reality shows is very high.
In spite of that it is good for growth. As per opinion of
psychologist, in stress, individual excels in his or her
career or competition. 2-Such kinds of competitions bring
out the latent talents in individuals. 3-Individuls' level
of confidence increases tremendously. 4-Competitiors come
nook and corner of India and on the basis of his or her
capability they get everything in his or her life. In earlier
days; for becoming a singer individuals used to take a long
time. Now, the way is too short, but quality is needed today
as well. Otherwise quality less person will be kicked out
from the market without showing any sympathy towards him.
5-Viewer also wants to watch such kinds of shows. In fact,
they enjoy shows. 6-Viewer feels attachment with shows throws
their participants. 7-Undoubtely some time viewer does not
cast vote to right participant on the basis of whereabouts
of participants. Such kind of philosophy must be discarded.
However, real candidate may also do extremely well in his
or her vocation on the basis of his or her calibre in the
coming days. In this way nobody can prevent the genuine
candidates being rewarded. 8- Mega prizes or reality shows
are superior way of getting employment. 9-Paticipation of
common men in these shows reflects positive sign. Need to
keep it up. 10-Now, common man also wants to be a star through
such class of shows. In other words people are daring to
see day dream and their day dreams are also coming true.
If we introspect over the said points we will unquestionably
understand the righteousness of mega prizes or reality shows.
AB Mehta:
The real spurt in programmes offering staggeringly high
prizes took place with the highly popular Kaun Banega Crorepati
hosted by Amitabh Bachhan. Since then the next crorepati
programme of Star plus hosted byShahrukh Khan was aired
and was followed by Kya aap panchvi pas se tez ho? Soni
did not want to miss encashing this greed mania and came
up with dus ka dum offering ten crores and hosted by Salman
Khan. The music competitions like Indian Idol, Amul Sangeet
competition for grown up as well as children aptly named
Ustad and chote Ustad, K for Kishore and similar programmes
from Zee etc are meeting the money and popularity aspirations
of the people. Overnight celebrity status apart from money
and contracts has not been restricted to persons from Metros
but has covered many middle class individuals from smaller
towns. The Judging of such competitions has brought about
many controversies. The over riding popular SMS votes has,
apart from making telecom companies richer at the cost of
crores of citizens, also generated many questions. There
were reports of not allowing certain votes and bulk voting
by groups in particular states and so on. Nobody in such
business spends money from their pocket. Also every stakeholder
has to make profit. So the poor common citizen is 'fooled'
to participate and pay for all these apart from the huge
prizes. The only positive point has been the opportunity
to talented people to find a platform to exhibit their competence
over extended period and get justified recognition. From
that angle the high prizes in talent competitions competitions
is justified. As regards the other shows, they border on
gambling or at best a game of chance, although it is hidden
behind a show of intelligence. The guest competitors in
such programmes appeared to get simpler questions and won
more than common participants. But they seem to give away
their prizes to charity. In a country short of good experiences
and happy situations any programme that keeps people indoor
enjoying a few minutes of entertainment is welcome. At least
they are better than sas-bahu intrigues and 'rona-dhona'
movies. As far as TV channels are concerned nothing can
be better than high TRPs, let the politicians and social
critics (and forum participants like us!) worry about the
impact on the behaviour of the common people.
KC Mouli: There
are three aspects relevant to the topic. Firstly talent
hunt, secondly infusing competitive spirit among youth and
finally opening up these competitions as avenues for a professional
career.
Initially the programmes served all the three purposes. One outstanding example of such competitions is singer Mahendra Kapoor who was rejected by the All India Radio during audition stating that his voice was not radio-genic. There are many such examples where talents could be explored in various performing arts including acting.
With the successful programmes like `Kaun Banega Karorpati' and other such programmes on the small screen, there was a rat race in this field. This race has resulted in the commercialisation of various popular programmes and the real spirit and objective of such programmes has been relegated to background.
Apparently these programmes have now reversed their roles. Firstly exploiting the talent, secondly popularising such talents on media-hype (without reference to their qualitative performance) and thus totally commercialising the whole performance. The recent failure of an earlier top performer to one of his former runners-up in the field of singing is sufficient proof in support of this conviction. Yet the huge awards of cash and kind for such performances do inspire talented persons, hitherto unknown in these performing arts, to try their luck. However lately it was observed that regional identity of the performing artiste was being exploited emotionally in achieving popularity hype which should be discouraged.
RK
Kutty: These are the times of mega shows through multifarious
television channels. It has both its pros and cones. Yes,
while the channels open up good platforms for our young
talents to excel in various fields and in the beginning
it was very well received by both the participants as well
as the viewers.
There were very interesting quiz programmes that gave good impetus to upcoming children to excel in competitive examination. KBC (Kaun Banega Crorepati) initially conducted by Big B Amitabh Bachchan and then by Shahrukh Khan were mega programmes that offered prizes to the tune of one crores and that were certainly very interesting.
But the problem started when the channels switched sides to promote only music, cinematic, and other mimicry/dance based programmes. Now the thrust is more on song based ones. Most of the South Indian channels like Asia Net continuously run such programme sponsored by Idea, titled Idea Star Singer, for which the prize offered are flats in places like Kochi or Dubai, costing about Rs 50 lakhs and this is also well received.
Then Z TVs Anthakshari and later Sare Gama too were big hits. Most of the prime relay times are consumed by such mega music, dance and other comedy/mimicry programmes and the practice of mega prizes makes it more interesting for the youngsters. But the fall backs often seen are that while these youngsters are heavily involved in such shows aspiring for big prizes, only very limited ones finally notch up the prizes and a large number are quite disappointed.
The scenes when such shows reach at the final stage were often presented lots of heart-burns. Further, the unfortunate incident of a girl that got terribly paralytic while performing on stage, reported to be on hearing some sarcastic remarks from the judges, prove even dangerous as the aspirations of the youngsters knew no bounds and the disappointment they receive in turn makes life quite miserable for them as well as their family.
Therefore, it would be better if such programmes are not hyped up and brought to such emotive pitch that breaks up heart and health together for participant's vis-a-vis viewers.
RJ
Khurana: Yes, they are and very much. Mumbai is an extremely
expensive city. Any one who goes to this city of the affluent
to make a career has to have crores of rupees for a reasonably
decent dwelling to live, designer clothing to wear and a
car to drive to work. Those who take part in the various
reality show contests have dreams of making big. If the
TV channels offer a pittance no real talent will flow to
Mumbai. All that the industry then gets will be morons.
The maxim `If you pay peanuts, you'll get monkey nowhere
holds truer than in Mumbai, the home of TV channels and
the Bollywood. "Na baap bada na bhaiya, sab se bada rupaiyya"
Dr
Visal A Khan: The concept of this big-ticket game show
is very simple! Few contestants from a LIVE studio audience
will be chosen by the host to play the game.
In the course of the game, the contestants will be made to choose any one door or walk away with the prizes offered along the way. But, what lies behind the door is the question...
The magical door could have anything from gold to clothes home appliances to a car Or NOTHING at all! If luck is at their end, all of this could be theirs for the taking. Set against a glamorous backdrop with loads of prizes offered to take home, hosts this show with great pride and delight.
Quick decision-making, high risk and luck are the keywords. Stay Connected" is a brand promise that looks at the key purpose of mobile telephony. It converges with the tangible requirement of 'network depth' & at the same time, reflects the eternal human need for bonding, kinsmanship, and relationship forming.
This new brand campaign enables Idea to own the biggest category benefit of "keeping people connected", through a simple, unique and likeable expression of connectivity. And it makes consumers aware that "no one connects better than Idea". Slated to run through, the campaign utilizes all relevant mainline media to propagate the message to its audiences with 60-second commercial and its various edits, print campaign & outdoor publicity.
Apart from it, various innovative media / events has been used to further strengthen the message.
Alpha
Reji: Reality shows are the `in-thing' these days. Viewers
are more inclined to watch them out of boredom of the stereotype
`saas-bahu' serials or family soaps more inclined to work
their lacrimal ducts.
Hence to keep the hapless viewers glued to the idiot box, mega prizes have to be doled out in turn who spend their hard earned money into their cell phones to feed the smses for some contestants. Pulling the emotional chord of the viewers seems to be last resort for these mega shows, which end dramatically.
Mega prizes are not at all good for the individuals since little they realize that the cost of the mega prizes are churned by the sponsors from the public at large in some way or the other. They are just a publicity gimmick to the immense consumer goods available in the market. So, the viewers are requested to think bit practically and not fall into the hands of people who have well crafted ideas to siphon off the hard earned money.
Enjoy viewing shows, after all they offer nothing more than entertainment.
Sushmita
Shrivastava: Mega prizes on TV channels are not good
for individuals, as the viewers and ordinary people who
work hard for meager payments are frustrated to see winners
walking away with huge prize money.
Ordinary people cannot even hope to save that much money even after years of hard labour. In such situation they are forced to conclude that hard work and labour is useless and a person who works hard all life always remain poor while winners of mega prizes become rich easily and quickly.
Besides the mega prizes are not good even for the winners, since the winners change their lifestyle quickly and their life becomes full of vices. They begin to avoid and look down their own relatives and friends who are not fortunate to become rich like them effortlessly.
And what is the most reprehensible aspect of all this is that the mega prize money comes from the pockets of ordinary people who work hard for small payments. Big industrialists and multinational companies cheat and fleece the customers to earn big money and give it to winners.
The frustrated youths even take to crime after seeing this unjust and cruel exploitation.