Tuesday March 11, 2008

Bhopal     Madhya Pradesh     Nation     Sports     Editorial     Astro     Business    


 
Search
Google   
News
World
Columnists
Opinion
Letters
Open Forum
Cartoon
Stock
Weather
Today's Picture
Classified
Matrimonial
Archives
 Home>>>Have your say 

 

Retrospective Law is bad  

At present before levying a penalty under Section 271 (1) the officer is required to record the reasons for believing that there is a willful misrepresentation by the assessee -a detailed statement on the reasons has to be noted in files. The same may be considered by higher authorities including courts for that justification. The minimum penalty is 100 per cent of amount concealed and the maximum is 300 per cent of the amount concealed.

It is now proposed to make retrospectively (wef April 1, 1989) that under Section 271 (1) penalty can be levied by the Income Tax officer on amount of disallowance without recording the reasons for it.

This provision is like punishing a person without Court's trial! As such it is most unjustified and bad in law. Also, it shall open more opportunities for harassment and corruption, both.

This proposed amendment must be dropped in public interest.

Mahesh Kapasi, Via e-mail 

 
Print This Page         Mail This Story
 
 


 

 

About us Contact us Terms & Conditions Advertisements

Asia News  © Central Chronicle 2007.  India News